![]() |
|

Is it possible that a reclusive man-like creature inhabits the remote areas of our planet? Why not ? Isn't it arrogant of us to assume we know of all the species on this huge planet ? Scientists will tell you that we don't. Only a few years ago, a unknown animal now named the Okapi was discovered. What about creatures we know of , but are thought to be extinct ? The coelacanth was thought to be extinct for 70 million years until they were discovered alive and well in 1938. So is it really that hard to believe that a hair covered, man-like creature could exist on the verge of discovery ? In many remote areas of the world there have been sightings of just such a creature. Known by many names such as Sasquatch, Yeti, Almas and many more. Is this an unknown primate, the "missing link" or some other yet unknown species ? There is evidence to support the existance of just such a creature in the Northwestern United States as well as other remote areas.
There are still numerous sightings every year. The descriptions of the creatures are very similar from sighting to sighting. There are discrepancies in some of the details but the mind does play tricks on us when frightened. Exaggeration and hoaxes do account for some of the discrepancies in the descriptions as well. The height is the most varied detail. Witnesses have reported the creatures to be from 5'6" to 8' +. This is easily explained if you take into account the possible age difference of the particular creature. Did they see and adult or juvenile ? There would be a noticeable size difference depending on the age. Then there are the foot prints,

The footprints left by the creatures are, on average, considerably larger than that of a human. On the most part, the creatures have been shy and reclusive. They normally try to avoid contact with humans. Every now and then there are reports of sightings in populated areas. Perhaps the creatures are just as curious about us as we are about them.

creature.
The began to run away when it noticed the two men, but not before Rodger
shot some film of the creature. The creature that was filmed was
a female, while you cannot see in this view, breast are clearly visable
in in other frames of the film. Scientists who have studied
the film have said that the estimated stride of the creature is larger
than that of a man. They also say it would have been very difficult
for a man for simulate this large stride. Footprints were also found
later at the same location. The footprints were the same type as
typically found at a bigfoot sighting.
This picture was
taken by a photographer on July 11, 1995 in the Wild Creek areain the foothills
of Snoqualmie National Forest. The picture was obtained from the
photographer by Cliff Crook, the director of Bigfoot Central. The
cameraman was out looking for a bigfoot when he heard splashing coming
from a stream, he found himself face to face with this creature.
WESTERN BIGFOOT SOCIETY More Bigfoot info
DOWNLOAD A FAQ ON CRYPTO_ZOOLOGY & BIGFOOT
OHIO BIGFOOT RESEARCH & STUDY GROUP
BIGFOOT: MAN OR BEAST, MYTH OR REALITY ?
BIGFOOT SIGHTING BT GEOGRAPHIC REGION
BIGFOOT PICTURES Text in French
NORHT AMERICAN BIGFOOT SOCIETY
BIGFOOT More BF Info
BIGFOOT ENCOUNTERS lots of info here, great page.
THE GLOBAL BIGFOOT ENCYCLOPEDIA an international sighting database
COPYRIGHT: Photographs 2, 4, and 5, are the copyright material of Rene Dahinden and are not to be reproduced without permission. For information on copyright provisions and available Bigfoot products (books, posters, casts etc.,), email cmurphy@axionet.com.
Wild Creek photo © 1998 Cliff Crook
The other images on this page were obtained from publicly available sources, and to the best of our knowlege, the images are in the public domain. If you own the copyright on any image on this page, and you would like us to remove it, please identify yourself and the image, and we will. If you own the copyright and you are willing to give us permission to use the image, we would like to know that also.
© 1998 shadows@serve.com (Shadow Lord)